Understanding Aloe Vera and Its Current Situation

by in Knowledge July 24, 2015

Bacteria flourish on your tongue, especially towards the back third. These bacteria break down the leftover food in your mouth, resulting in substances called volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs). These VSCs are the most common cause of bad breath. To treat this kind of bad breath, you need to reduce the number of bacteria in your mouth.

The bacteria responsible for bad breath thrive when your mouth is dry. Unfortunately, conventional mouthwash, which contains alcohol, dries out your mouth and may cause bad breath more than it helps. Instead of an alcohol-based mouthwash, look for alcohol-free varieties or products that contain “chlorine dioxide,” which attacks the VSCs at the molecular level to treat bad breath at the source instead of just covering up the smell.

One of the easiest ways to do this is by maintaining good oral hygiene—regular flossing (daily) and brushing the teeth and tongue (at least twice per day). The tongue is a hotbed of bacterial growth, harboring millions of organisms in a bunch of tiny nooks and crannies. The most efficient way of cleaning the tongue is with a tongue scraper, a special tool made of plastic or metal scraped along the surface to remove the film of bacteria. The scraper should be placed as far back on the tongue as you can to remove the most bacteria as possible. Early 2015, the California Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) intends to list Aloe Vera, whole leaf extract as a known state to cause cancer under the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (Proposition 65). With this listing, many businesses and clients around the globe, who do business in California, are questioning the current situation at hand. With OEHHA accepting emails and comments about this situation from many different parties and professions, it appears that many people believe that ANYTHING deriving from Aloe Vera is now banned from the state of California. That is in fact false.

So what is Aloe Vera? Aloe Vera (refer to as Aloe barbadenis Miller plant) is a succulent plant widely used in alternative medicine, cosmetics, and drinks. Aloe Vera is one of the oldest mentioned plants on record due to its medicinal properties and health benefits. Ancient Egyptians and Chinese used Aloe Vera to treat fevers, burns, and wounds. It was even mentioned in history that Alexander the Great used Aloe Vera to treat wounded soldiers and that Cleopatra used aloe in her daily skin treatments. Also reported in 1944, the Japanese used aloe gel to heal their wounds and claimed to have faster healing/less scaring. If you look at an image of an Aloe Vera plant, you see it is similar to a cactus. Of course, no one is going to eat the shell of a cactus (due to its thorns), instead, they will cut it up and filter out the useful part.

What made OEHHA concern about Aloe Vera was that it contained a substance called aloin. Aloin, also known as Barbaloin, is a chemical compound that has been declared by the US FDA (2002) to be a causer of cancer and tumors. To avoid lawsuits in 2002, many companies have already developed methods to remove the aloin from multiple natural products. This lead to the creation/application of Aloe Vera decolorized powders, oils, butters, and extracts where the Aloin was filtered out via carbon filtration.

How are companies approaching this new listing? With the collaboration of many scientists, formulators, and lawyers from many natural-made companies, it has been declared that…

“OEHHA’s (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment) proposed listing identifies the chemical concerned as “Aloe Vera, whole leaf extract”. It defines whole leaf extract of Aloe vera as “the liquid portion of the Aloe vera leaf, (what remains after removal of fibrous material, such as lignified plant fibers)” and importantly clarifies that this substance is not the same as Aloe vera decolorized whole leaf extract, Aloe vera gel, Aloe vera gel extract, or Aloe vera latex, which would not be covered by this proposed listing.”

With this declaration, many companies urged OEHHA to redefine its listing to avoid confusion of what the proposed Proposition 65 listing covers and what it does not cover. The company requests that the title of the proposed material be modified to read ”Aloe vera, non-decolorized whole leaf extract” with an appropriate description to clarify that this material is an unpurified ingredient since it contains Aloin.

So what is the future looking like for many Cosmetic companies and their Aloe Vera products? Still good, as long as they grasp the situation, don’t use Aloe Vera (whole leaf extract), and can confidentially address the understanding about Aloe Vera to their clients. Some cosmetic companies who use Aloe Vera, whole leaf extract, for their products will have to resort to the alternative Aloe Vera materials mentioned before.

Will there be a decline in product quality? With the US FDA mandate in 2002, many cosmetic ingredients and formulation companies have already implemented the alternative Aloe Vera ingredients in their products throughout the years. It has been claimed by Terry Laboratories, a company of quality Aloe Vera extracts/concentrates, and multiple high-end cosmetic companies that products like Aloe Vera powder (decolorized and carbon filtered) actually provide excellent skin and hair care.

But isn’t this longer “natural”? Look at the overall situation like this, the Aloe Vera, whole leaf extract, being listed by OEHHA is an unpurified ingredient that can cause cancer. The current Aloe Vera products being implemented already are purified ingredients. This is similar to filtering drinking water or cutting blowfish (Fugu) into eatable sushi. Overall, this policy is to be seen as listing an unpurified ingredient. The aloe products used by us (Aloe Vera powders, oils, butters, and Extracts) are NOT affected by this proposed listing. They are all decolorized at some point in the processing via carbon filtration to remove Aloin and therefore are not subject to the Proposition 65 proposed listing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *